NPTEL NBA Accreditation and Teaching-Learning in Engineering (NATE) Assignment 11

Assignment 11

Quiz 11

1 point

Participants in the process used to identify extent of compliance of the curriculum for attaining POs & PSOs are

 Principal and Head of Department only

 Head of Department and Faculty only

 Head of Department only

 All internal and external stake holders 

No, the answer is incorrect.
Score: 0

Accepted Answers:

All internal and external stake holders 

1 point

Program Articulation Matrix depicts the correlation between the courses and

 Program Outcomes only

 Program Specific Outcomes only

 Both Program Outcomes and Program Specific Outcomes

 With COs if it is a Tier II institute

No, the answer is incorrect.
Score: 0

Accepted Answers:

Both Program Outcomes and Program Specific Outcomes

1 point

Methodologies must be available

 To support weak students

 Encourage bright students

 Both To support weak students and Encourage bright students

 Are not required as per NBA, though these are desirable

No, the answer is incorrect.
Score: 0

Accepted Answers:

Both To support weak students and Encourage bright students

1 point

COs of any course, taken together

 Must necessarily address all the POs and all the PSOs

 May or may not address all the POs and all the PSOs

 Must necessarily address all the POs but may not necessarily address all the PSOs

 May not necessarily address all the POs but must necessarily address all the PSOs

No, the answer is incorrect.
Score: 0

Accepted Answers:

May or may not address all the POs and all the PSOs

1 point

With reference to writing the COs, which of the following holds

 NBA requires the use of Original Bloom’s taxonomy

 NBA requires the use of Revised Bloom’s taxonomy

 NBA does not specify any taxonomy for writing COs, but Bloom’s Taxonomy (Original / Revised) is most commonly used in India

 NBA states explicitly that some Taxonomy must be followed

No, the answer is incorrect.
Score: 0

Accepted Answers:

NBA does not specify any taxonomy for writing COs, but Bloom’s Taxonomy (Original / Revised) is most commonly used in India

1 point

When the actual attainment of a CO is equal to the set target level,

 The target must necessarily be raised for the next offering of the course

 The target must necessarily be the same for the next offering of the course

 The target may be raised or retained at same levels with an explanation of the rationale for retaining the same level

 The target may be raised, retained at same level, or even lowered

No, the answer is incorrect.
Score: 0

Accepted Answers:

The target may be raised or retained at same levels with an explanation of the rationale for retaining the same level

1 point

One of the criteria for awarding NBA accreditation for 6 years is that the Student-Faculty Ratio is at least

 15 : 1 

 20 : 1

 25 : 1

 Student-Faculty Ratio is irrelevant for the award of accreditation for 6 years

No, the answer is incorrect.
Score: 0

Accepted Answers:

15 : 1 

1 point

The number of available Professors is zero, and also the number of available Associate Professors is zero for a particular program. The marks awarded under Faculty Cadre Proportion for this program would be

 Zero if the program belongs to a Tier I institute but may be non-zero if the program belongs to a Tier II institute

 Zero if the program belongs to a Tier II institute but may be non-zero if the program belongs to a Tier I institute

 Zero whether the program belongs to a Tier I institute or a Tier II institute

 It depends on the number of available Assistant Professors, and this holds for both Tier I and Tier II institutes

No, the answer is incorrect.
Score: 0

Accepted Answers:

Zero whether the program belongs to a Tier I institute or a Tier II institute

1 point

In the sub-criterion on Faculty Retention, the term “Faculty Retention” means that the required Student-Faculty Ratio is retained during the period of assessment keeping CAYm2 as base year.
The above Statement is

 True

 False

No, the answer is incorrect.
Score: 0

Accepted Answers:

False

1 point

For the sub-criterion on “Faculty Innovations in Teaching and Learning”, one of the evaluation guidelines is that the work

 Must have been presented in a conference

 Must have been published in a peer-reviewed journal

 Must be available for peer review and critique 

 Must have won an award

No, the answer is incorrect.
Score: 0

Accepted Answers:

Must be available for peer review and critique